A puzzle about accommodation and truth
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract The purpose of this paper is to present and discuss a puzzle involving accommodation. based on three assumptions. first assumption that accommodation takes place after an utterance. second can make difference the truth-value utterance even if not about future. third something cannot unless Since these assumptions are jointly inconsistent, one them must be false. question which we ought reject. majority discussion devoted discussing each options, tentative conclusion most plausible strategy reject thesis. That amounts saying
منابع مشابه
A Puzzle about Truth and Singular Propositions 1 1 . Singular Propositions
My dissertation consists of three essays in the Metaphysics of Modality: In "A Puzzle about Truth and Singular Propositions," I consider two theses that seem to be true and then an argument for the conclusion that they form an inconsistent pair. One thesis is that a proposition that is singular with respect to a given object implies that the object exists. This is so because the proposition pre...
متن کاملA puzzle about withholding
This paper presents a puzzle about justification and withholding. The puzzle arises in a special case where experts advise us to not withhold judgment. My main thesis is simply that the puzzle is genuinely a puzzle, and so leads us to rethink some common assumptions in epistemology, specifically assumptions about the nature of justification and doxastic attitudes. Section 1 introduces the commo...
متن کاملTruth about Truth Detecting Techniques
During the period from 2001 to 2010 police officials in India were lured by a team of pseudo-scientists, from the Forensic Laboratories in Bangalore and Ahmadabad to make use of narcoanalysis, polygraph test and brain fingerprinting to extract confessions from accused persons. All the three tests, preceded by a pre-test interview and interrogation, were conducted by the one and the same expert ...
متن کاملA puzzle about belief updating
In recent decades much literature has been produced on disagreement; the puzzling conclusion being that epistemic disagreement is, for the most part, either impossible (e.g. Aumann (Ann Stat 4(6):1236–1239, 1976)), or at least easily resolvable (e.g. Elga (Noûs 41(3):478–502, 2007)). In this paper I show that, under certain conditions, an equally puzzling result arises: that is, disagreement ca...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Philosophical Studies
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1573-0883', '0031-8116']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01693-2